Behind the Stage

By Ijlal Ahmad Khattak

For the last few days since the incident of mlala has occurred, I have been watching that every Pakistani international media channel is speaking for mala yousaf zai. Every other nog is cashing malala, every political party is talking about mala, and even the international media has left all other important issues specifically the drones attack and is busy in projecting malala issue 24/7. Now the question that alert me and feared me is that why this incident has been given that much importance, why this much media projection has been give to malala, we have watching such incidents for the last 12 years since the US attack on Afghanistan, since US started drones attack on our tribal area, why they were silent why our own media was silent when we see hundred and thousands of malalas get buried under the rubble of school building when struck by either drones or in military operation where were they, this all give me the feeling that something is going wrong which is staged behind the issue of innocent malala yousfzai. Something very distractive has been planned.

few days back we find some foreign activists who joined imran khan in long march against drones attack, the involvement of US citizen, in the voice against drones attack has been witnessed from all the corners of united states, many of journalist started writing against the drones attacks, and the violation of the sovereignty of Pakistan,  and this has started creating problem for the obama administration, and we also know that after bush administration obma is the big supporter of drones attack. But due to this change in the attitude of people of United States can create problem for obma administration, so to justify their stance they need something to support their voice and change the attitude of people in their favour and the incident of malala is key incident in this connection which they can use in their favour. This is one dimension of this incident which shows that why this particular issue has been give that much importance, the second dimension is internal to the issue that is the North Waziristan military operation, we have see huge military deployment in North Waziristan for the last six, seven month as compared to other agencies so such huge deployment showed that the military had planned and made all necessary arrangements but were waiting for a suitable time which was provided by the incident of innocent malala, because in the back ground of every operation we see such incident like malala, if we looked into swat operation we see a fake video of young girl which was given the punishment of lashes, and show to the world the barbarism of Taliban, this issue was give similar treatment in media and a hype was created just to fold the public opinion in favor of military operation and after few weeks we see full-fledged military operation in swat valley. If we looked to south Waziristan operation we see some what the same treatment, when terrorists attack was carried out against the leader of the ruling party late Bainzir Bhutto at that time Mr Rehman Malik came on media and give a statement that the terrorists were form Waziristan and after some days we see that government gives green signal for military operation in south Waziristan.  now the way the media is projecting the issue plus the military preparedness and deployment in north Waziristan shows that they need clear reason which they found in the shape of the malala yousafzai who is on her death bed and fighting for survival.

Now again the question raises that why military will make such incidents as an excuse for operation, so the answer to that is, for a  full-fledged operation, military establishment need strong political and public support which can be only achieve if such incidents are publicized to the extent that public them self demand to start or launch military operation. But in the context of malala yousafzai the public opinion regarding North Wazirstan is divided, but still we have to see that whether this would be enough to mold the public in favour of military establishment to launch North Waziristan operation for which they are almost prepared or not and whether this issue will provide enough help to US government in support of their stance on drones these are the few question which are still unanswered.

History of Muslim Press in Sub-Continent

History of Muslim Press in Sub-Continent 
                                                                                                                        by ijlal ahmad

Before i discuss the role of Muslim press in India and its importance in shaping the public opinion before the partition, it is imperative that i take a brief look at the history of Muslims, their Invasions in India, the fall of Mughal Empire, British Raj and financial and social condition of Muslims in the 19^th century as all of this has a relevance with the political happenings that occurred later on.

Muslims have a very proud history in South Asia and especially in India.  The first Muslim foray into India was the invasion of Sindh in 712 A.D lead by Mohammad Bin Qasim who defeated Raja Dahir. After that, Muslims never looked back and invaded India to spread Islam. Muslim rule in India lasted for approximately a thousand years. Countless number of Hindu’s and people from other religions converted to Islam.  Some of the great Muslim rulers of India include Mahmud Ghaznavi, Mohammad Ghouri, Qutub –ud-din Aibak, Ghiyas-ud-din Balban, Tipu Sultan and the Mughal emperors like Babar, Aurangzeb,  Jehangir, Akbar, etc. and the last Mughal emperor was Bahadur Shah Zafar II, who probably was not as strong as some of the previous Muslim rulers. Bahadur Shah Zafar II took part in the Sepoy Mutiny, 1857 and after its failure he was imprisoned. He died in 1862 and with him the Mughal rule came to an end and that resulted in the end of Muslim dominance in India.

East India Company started trading in India since 1612 and they gradually strengthened their roots in the economy of India and across South Asia. Slowly but gradually, East India Company became so strong in India that they started to influence the rulers and the governance in India. After the 1857 revolt, British officially took control of India and the time period between 1857 till the partition of India in 1947 is called the British Raj.

The situation of Muslims was quite pathetic in the 19^th century. Muslims were quite backward as far as the education is concerned and as a result they started to decline in every field of life.

By the start of the 19^th century, Muslims had lost control of India and these were the dying moments of Muslim rule in the sub-continent but Muslims were not ready to accept it mentally after such a long rule in India. That is why they always took the British as their enemy, whereas the Hindus took advantage of the situation and got very close to the British by showing them their loyalty. All this caused the British to always give the first priority to the Hindus in every field as they started to adopt the western lifestyle as well.

There was an impression within the British that Muslims were behind the 1857 revolt (mutiny) and they tempted the Hindus and Sikhs as well. The British started to take Muslims as their real enemy. This impression amongst the British was enough to rub salt into the wounds of the Muslims. Muslims were deprived of the better job opportunities and their financial situation got extremely poor. Considering the state of Muslims after the 1857 revolt, it was very important for the Muslim newspapers, magazines and press in general to start creating awareness amongst the Muslims about the importance of education and the modern lifestyle. One of the major reasons behind this was the fear amongst the educated Muslims that the Hindus might get closer to the British Government, which would give them political benefit.

Urdu journalism started in India with Jam-e-Jahan Numa but the real role and history of Urdu press started in 1836, when Maulvi Muhammad Baqar started “Delhi Urdu Akhbar”. After 1836, large number of Urdu newspapers started their operations from different parts of the Sub-continent and the main purpose behind Urdu journalism was to create awareness amongst the Muslims, who were slowly but gradually losing control of India.

In 1830, East India Company declared Urdu as the official language of small government institutions and court of law. Government intended to promote Western Studies in the sub-continent. Since Urdu newspapers were appropriate medium for the purpose, the government used to purchase a certain quantity of newspapers for officials, schools and colleges. The government financially supported some of the newspapers.

Before the evolution of the Two Nation Theory in the 20^th century presented by Allama Mohammad Iqbal which meant that Hindus and Muslims of the sub-continent were separate nations and they cannot live together in the same culture. The objective of the Muslim press during that period was generally to educate the Muslims and with the passage of time it emphasized on self-awakening of the Muslims of India, so that they can stand up and fight for their identity, religion and educational and political rights. It ended up changing the public opinion amongst the Muslims to demand and fight not only for the separate identity but also a separate homeland where they can practice their religion and live a life free of slavery. It was because of the press and inspirational leadership that Muslims were able to unite themselves once again after the turmoil of 1857.

With the downfall of the Mughal rule, Britain started offensive invasion in the sub-continent. Wherever the Muslims were in majority, there was quite a significant hatred for the British and people started privately-owned secret handwritten papers in order to induce and stimulate more agony and reaction against the British and especially the East India Company. In the 1857 war of independence, such papers played an important role.

The British rule in India had caused so much unrest amongst the Indians that they decided to revolt against the British. However, the war of independence was a total failure and Indians could not resist against the strong British. At that time, there were a number of daily and weekly English newspapers and magazines which were either owned by the British or the Anglo Indians as compared to the Muslim newspapers which could be counted on fingertips. Muslims had strong press only in Delhi and they tried their level best. Some of the leading newspapers published from Delhi were Delhi-Urdu Akhbar, Sadiq-ul-Akhbar and Siraj-ul-Akhbar. . Because of the British strength, the Muslim press was very much suppressed by the East India Company. As far as journalism and press is concerned, Muslims were detached of journalistic practice and their newspapers were either banned or diminished. Some Muslim newspapers had to shut their business down themselves in fear of the British atrocities.

In 1853, there were approximately 35 vibrant Urdu newspapers but only 12 had survived till 1857 in which just one newspaper was owned by a Muslim. These incidents completely isolated the Muslims from journalism and the journalistic practices in sub-continent. But later on, Muslim press developed significantly with the efforts of some of the great Muslim leaders like Sir Syed Ahmed Khan and competed with the Hindu and British press in India.

Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was a great Muslim reformer, educationists and politician of the Sub-continent. After the revolt against the British, when the position of the Muslims in the Sub-continent was quite pathetic and Muslims were going through a social and financial crisis, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan came to the forefront and created awareness amongst Muslims about the importance of education and a lifestyle which was closer to the British. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan made sure that the Muslims understood the importance of the modern education and science, so that they could compete with the Hindus and could claim their rights for the job opportunities and a better lifestyle.

Sir Syed started Aligarh Movement, which had a motto of promoting education amongst the Muslims after the revolt of 1857. He fought against the Hindu conspiracies against Urdu. Risala-dar-Asbab-i-Bhagawati-i-Hind, Ahkam-i-Ta’am-i-Ahl-i-Kitab and Loyal Mohammadans of India were some of his best works. He started various schools and colleges where English language was taught with Urdu and Persian. He founded a Scientific Society where he started the periodical which was first called Scientific Society Papers and later, the Aligarh Institute Gazette.

Sir Syed Ahmed Khan played a significant role in reshaping the public opinion amongst the Muslims. After 1857, Sir Syed had realized that it is very hard for Muslims to survive with the Hindus but still he was in favour of the United India until the Urdu-Hindi controversy.

Sir Syed Ahmed Khan would always be remembered in the history books as a revolutionary leader who gave a new direction to the Muslims of the Sub-continent which took them to the way of independence. Sir Syed’s role can be referred as the root of the making of Pakistan and the separation from the Hindus.

For the purpose of creating awareness amongst the Muslim masses in India, Sir Syed used press to great effect during the late 19^th century.

Khilafat movement was an effort by the Indian Muslims to save the Ottoman Empire. It was a pan-Islamic movement between 1919 till 1924. Some of the great journalists of that time like Maulana Mohammad Ali Johar and his brother Maulana Shaukat Ali worked very hard for this cause with lots of other important personalities. The Muslim press and newspapers also played an important role amongst the Muslims about the importance of the Khilafat Movement. Initially the movement was quite successful through strikes and protests all over India but this movement could not gain a lot of success in the long run. However, the role of Muslim press during that time would always be remembered in history with golden words.

Although the Khilafat Movement was not a success, it united the Muslims of Sub-continent and injected a new spirit amongst them which was the real energy behind the independence movement later on.

In the 25^th session of All-India Muslim League organized in Allahabad, Dr. Allama Mohammad Iqbal presented the idea of two nation theory which states that Hindus and Muslims are two separate nations and it is very hard for both of these nations to live together in a same society. Muslims have a completely separate code of conduct for life which is totally opposite to the Hindus, so it is better that Muslims and Hindus should separate and India should be divided in two parts or may be more.

Muslim press played a significant role in India to spread this message in the Muslims of India. It was very important for the Muslims to be united under one platform and one agenda because there was a school of thought amongst the Muslims which was against the separation from Hindus and the division of India. But the Muslim press did a great job in uniting the Muslims and convincing them that they are not left with any other option apart from demanding a separate country for themselves.

Some of the leading journalists of their time, Mohammad Ali Johar, Zafar Ali Khan and Hasrat Mohani were extremely influential amongst the Muslims of India and they did play a huge part in creating political awareness in the country. That era was known for the ‘militant journalism’ because the Muslims press had to face a lot of trouble in the presence of British atrocities.

Some of the leading Muslim owned newspapers which played huge part in the making of Pakistan are as follows:

Jang started its publications from Delhi in 1938. Mir Khalil-ur-Rehman was the founder of this daily newspaper and Mir Javaid was the chairman at that time. The basic goal of Jang was to update the Indian Muslims about the latest happening in the political scene and All Pakistan Muslim League. Jang played a crucial role in the Pakistan movement. Jang believed and practiced freedom of expression.  Good Urdu composing was the quality of this newspaper even at the time when there were not much facilities available for the Muslim journalists. Jang also provided International News to its readers.

Nawa-i-Waqt was launched on 23^rd March 1940 which apparently is the day when the Pakistan Resolution took place in Lahore. Hameed Nizami was the founder of Naw-i-Waqt. It is also one of the pioneers in Urdu reporting with Jang.

The Pakistan Times was launched on 4^{th of} February, 1947. It was an English daily and had more significance as it was launched by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. It catered the educated class of Indian Muslim.

Dawn was launched in 1940, again by Quaid e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Mr. Pothan Joseph was its first editor and later on in 1945 Mr. Altaf Hussain became the editor of Dawn. The basic motto of Dawn was to represent the Muslims of India and their point of view about the partition.

After the 1857 war of independence, Muslims were deprived of some of the fundamental human rights including Journalistic practices and freedom of speech. Muslims were facing their worst time in the sub-continent since their arrival and the invasion in the area. There were not enough jobs and the financial situation got bad to worse. On top of that, the Hindus were able to convince the British that their actual enemies were Muslims and not the Hindus. British Raj felt that Muslims instigated the Hindus in the 1857 War of Independence. As compared to the Muslims, Hindus did have the press freedom.

In this worst condition, the Muslim leaders and top journalists stood up and changed the destiny of the Indian Muslims by creating awareness amongst them and letting them know that they can no longer afford to neglect modern education and the English language. Slowly but gradually, Muslims were able to stand on their feet again through some inspirational leaders and that would not have been possible without an effective press.

Initially, the Muslim press worked on shaping up the public opinion so that they could understand the political scenario of India at that time and could adjust with the Hindus and the British Raj in a same society and culture. A sequence of events changed the political scenario of India and the press successfully shaped up the public opinion amongst the Muslims of India about the partition and the demand of a separate country. The poetry of Iqbal and some other poets like Hasrat Mohani were inspirational in re-building the morale of the Muslims. They gave them the direction to work upon.

Once the Muslims had decided mutually that they do not want anything less than a separate country, the role of the Muslim Newspapers like Dawn, Zameendar, Jang and Nawa-i-Waqt was influencing.

 The newspapers made sure that the Muslims are aware of the political activities of their leader Quaid e Azam and All India Muslim League.

Overall, we can say that Muslim press and journalists could not have done a better job considering the circumstances. There were so many difficulties for the Muslim press but they stood up to the challenges and proved their metal by shaping up the public opinion in favor of the partition and eventually carving out a separate homeland in a very short span of time. 

Thanks for reading

comments on my articles on face book page. towards journalist on Dr shakeel afridi

my picture during live coverage for www.saach.tv a social media.

http://saach.tv/2012/06/11/urducol-11-6-12/

Dr Shakeel Afridi, the follower.

Writer: IJLAL AHMAD KHATTAK

Recently, the issue of Dr. Shakeel Afridi arrest and conviction has raised many questions in different circles as well as among the youth,

 For some he termed to be a traitor, while some consider him a spy and an agent still there are some which argued “Dr. Shakeel Afridi is an angel in disguise”

Whatever the background of all these circles are, but one think that comes quite clear and loud is the country is ideologically split over the basic concept of decade long war on terror in this region.

If we consider him a traitor for his role in helping the US eliminate Osama Bin Ladin by providing   the  information about the world most dangerous character,  then the question arise that what we called those who handed over hundreds and thousands of Pakistani to  united state of America which are interrogated in guantanamubay  and about whom the than president of Pakistan  Gen Musharaf wrote in his book “ In the line of fire” and admitted that he handed over people as per the demand of USA and received handsome money in return. Was musharaf act lawful and did not attract provisions of treason? If we look at case of Musharaf and Dr. Shakeel Afridi both worked for the same country and in return received payment for their act, but one was given Guard of honor and the other was given 33 year of imprisonment under the controversial tribal law FCR. Why this discrimination between the two? In fact there are many among us who believe that , Dr Shakeel Afridi should have been given highest award for helping CIA in tracking Osama bin Laden, who was the giant terrorist and US waged a war against him in Afghanistan in order to kill him but were failed to do so.

But for many it was a heroic and courageous act on the part of Dr Shakeel Afridi, they are of the opinion that his efforts in eliminating the biggest threat to the world peace of OBL and weakening of al Qaeda and its affiliates. He being the leader of the militant organization Al Qaida had the blood of thousands of innocent men, women and children on his hands, and become the reason for bringing bad name to Islam in specific and Muslim umma in general, and had also become the reason for US who killed millions of muslim men, women and children just because of one man “Osama bin Laden”. They consider Osama bin Laden and his militant organization al-Qaida as the solemnly responsible for bring Pakistan and Afghanistan in this bloody war.

Most of the people and columnist quoted Dr Ghulam Nabi Fai an American national spying for Pakistan and Pollard the US citizen spying for Israel were traitor, but the question arises whether the situation of the above two alike to that of Dr Shakeel Afridi or not. The answer to this question is no because the above two were spying for one country against another where as the case of Dr Shakeel Afridi is totally different, he spied against the world most wanted terrorist which has been declared the father of terrorism and all the leader of the world had shown consensus for declaring him terrorist.

But still there are some who called him neither a hero nor a traitor but just a spy, with a logic that what he did was driven by monitory benefits, so calling him a hero is unjust to those who are the real hero’s for the world, and calling him a traitor would also be unjust because what he did was not against the nation or the country but was to follow the flow of money.